|
Post by trailway125luc on Dec 10, 2012 11:04:19 GMT
hi everyone not sure its retro but its 12 years old I'm from Hartford's and I'm 18 this is my 3rd bike and the best bike bye far I'm new to riding a 125 and it was relay easy to learn on its a strong 4 stroke and has survived an accident all ready hopefully i can learn some stuff on here future plans are to do a few little bits to the bike but keeping it standard its got a GRB exhaust on it as the old one snapped so yeah hers the bike ;D Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by dungbug on Dec 10, 2012 11:48:20 GMT
Hope the accident was nothing too serious (?). You've done the right thing & got back on which is great. ;D Any plans for going for the full license? I know the new directive come's into play next year.
|
|
|
Post by trailway125luc on Dec 10, 2012 15:54:17 GMT
Hi mate yeah I think I come of worse then the bike with a broken wrist. Now has a plate in it and spent far to much time of The bike and work but. It's all part of the. Fun right lol. How old is it wen the new law comes in and want to get confident anoth before I go for. It
|
|
|
Post by dungbug on Dec 10, 2012 17:21:14 GMT
Sadly work usually pays for the bike, I'm in the same boat. Broken wrist isn't too bad.......As long as you learn from it it's all good. The new directive comes into play at the start of 2013, iirc anyone under the age of 24 at the start of 2013 does the same Mod 1 + 2 tests but only gains a license to allow you to ride a bike under 47BHP. People aged 24 and over gain an unrestricted license and can ride whatever BHP they want. If you get a restricted license it isn't automatically upgraded to a full unrestricted so you have to take Mod 1 + 2 tests again when you're 24+ (yeah.....Sucks ar*e doesn't it! ). No idea why they've done this other than use it as a money spinner, imo if a rider has done 2 years on a 47BHP machine then the restriction should be taken off as it is/was with the 33BHP (light bike) license. I can see a lot of riders staying on 125's until they reach 24 to avoid paying for 2 lots of training/tests, ask any driver to re-take their driving tests after a few years and most would struggle I reckon which is why I think this new directive is unfair. ***Gets off orange box and walks away grumbling***
|
|
|
Post by TerraRoot on Dec 10, 2012 21:35:06 GMT
thing i hate most about all these bloody laws, fecking 125s are the most dangerous things! the lighter the bike is, the more twitchy it is!
|
|
|
Post by dungbug on Dec 10, 2012 23:24:03 GMT
thing i hate most about all these bloody laws, fecking 125s are the most dangerous things! the lighter the bike is, the more twitchy it is! Totally agree, manouvring a GS on a slalom was a lot easier than the GN125....Felt more 'planted' and a lot more stable. The new directive is nothing more than a money spinner, if it wasn't then anyone who passes should automatically have their license upgraded to allow the rider to ride any bike regardless of BHP rather than pay for re-taking the same tests again. Although I was speaking to one of the instructors at my local school not that long ago and he said it was 'under discussion' to do away with the 2 part test and have it back to what it was before, a single road test. I'm not sure how they'd incorporate the swerve avoidance/slalom/figure 8 etc in a 'road' test. Sounds like the powers that be are happy to pee more money up the wall making changes that don't need making in the first place.
|
|